Most people by now would have seen all the announcements surrounding the new Microsoft Surface 2. These announcements pretty much outline the new refined measures taken to make the tablet/laptops more compelling in the eyes of its targeted consumers.
That is essentially what I want to talk about today, the targeted consumers.
If you look at Microsoft Surface on its own in isolation outside the competing influences the product itself is reasonably well designed. It has the benefits of a laptop and tablet in one whilst at the same time runs all your Windows specific applications natively (assuming your not subscribed to ARM constraints).
The reality however it’s not looked at in this light from a consumer and retail mindset. The product today is positioned as a Tablet, meaning its job is to compete against products that iPad and Android occupy quite heavily which means the category itself is quite saturated and has consumers conditioned to approach a tablet as a middle ground between Mobile and Laptop (i.e. the spectrum between Mobile Device and Laptops were defined, tablets would probably sit neatly in the middle).
Furthermore, the Surface Pro also is often not associated as being different within retail stores from these competing tablet products and is often found on the same shelf space as their counterparts. The only real distinguishable difference between a Surface and other products on the shelf is the Windows 8 tile screen and maybe the blue/pink keyboard(s).
Once you acknowledge that the Surface Pro is now in a heated battle around gaining attention of consumers with other tablets they are also equally in a fierce competitive battle over price (which is slowly in many ways becoming a race to the price bottom given tablets are losing their social currency – i.e. nothing *really* new is happening in terms of points of difference).
Occupying the Tablet category is not easy challenge for any company but with Surface Pro it doesn’t end there. No, they also now have to compete equally in the Laptop category and given most retail channels like BestBuy prefer to position the products in the Tablet Category they also have to find ways to claw out of that and reposition the product also in the Laptop marketing category.
That’s where it also gets slightly difficult because those distinguishing signatures that I mentioned earlier around Windows 8 tile screen no longer are unique, as all competing hardware makers use that as well. So now you’re competing on brand loyalty, price and hardware specifications.
Competing on those fronts isn’t easy as not only do you as Microsoft now have skin in the hardware game you also have a smaller shelf space to occupy – much like Coke vs Pepsi in Super Market(s). Dell, Samsung, HP etc. all have maybe 3-4 products at any given point sitting on the shelf as well and can afford to keep pumping out different iterations faster given this is their core business.
Hopefully I’ve painted a picture that will give you a moment of pause to think beyond the actual product itself and moreover how do you gain the attention of the potential consumer. As it’s not about “I have the best quality product of all” because in reality nobody can accurately say for sure that’s true. It’s the 2nd generation attempt at entering a market that the 1st generation has failed on. Moreover the pricing for the product(s) isn’t exactly a bliss point entry because should they become successful the competitors will find ways to undercut or fight more aggressively to retain relevance.
Can all this be done though?
I think it could be done if the right ingredients were in place, first of all you’d need to find a way to frame the proposition you’re putting forward to your consumers in terms they understand – that is, you have to convince every user out there that having a tablet/laptop in one is what they need & want.
Secondly, you will need to find a way to separate your product from the herd in the retail channel because right now although the brand Microsoft and Windows are attached to the said product(s) it’s also attached to the competing brands as well (ie its over-used and saturated). Microsoft have to work their product line like Apple does, by having a separate table / shelf for their products to occupy and be distinguished from the rest.
Thirdly you have to find a way to become the circuit breaker for the taxonomy of online retail, by opening up a new category “both” as if you’re going to say the product on one hand is a tablet and a laptop then you need to find a way to position the products in that light. If you position in the tablet category (like today) then your $2,000 AUD Surface top of the range model will stand out as being insanely expensive for a tablet?
If you in turn occupy the Laptop then you’re $899 AUD tablet with low specs looks cheap but fails on hardware specifications – moreover you also run the risk of positioning the brand as a “cheap” solution thus potentially poisoning your own well (ie “Surface = Cheap crap” perception could easily run unmanaged).
The reality is Microsoft really haven’t got a structured story here with Surface Pro, it’s what I’d call a “shotgun” approach to competing with Apple/Google. In that it appears they are just collapsing the products for the sake of compete rather than actually trying to disrupt the behaviour we humans have around mobility.
The product itself isn’t a measured response, its just reactive and filled with a lot of panic around how to solve this problem. The entire thing could be handled much carefully and strategically by simply easing into the above categories with momentum behind them vs just trying to force their way into the mindset of consumers that all-in-one is the best strategy.
Lastly assuming they abandon these silly ads with people jumping around clicking keyboards and actually focus on “why” someone needs to buy the product they also face a very long entrenched campaign ahead.
If they are onto a winning formula and assuming that they sort their marketing talent out, then they also have to wait out the consumers who currently have laptop and tablet out which could be 1-2 years minimum.
Normally this wouldn’t be an issue but keep in mind Microsoft is about to get a brand new CEO with his/her own ideas about Surface Pro and if anything Microsoft’s marketing machine has shown that they can’t handle a controlled message beyond the life of a single campaign.
- Surface as a brand will undergo a split, they will likely retreat back to forking the tablet and laptop offerings. There will likely be no technical difference between the two and price and category matching will likely influence it.
- Surface will have poor sales for the next 1-2 years and the industry will remind them off this without mercy. There is to much aggravation in the hardware space for Microsoft to occupy and they not only have to compete on Consumer sales but also Enterprise pie will decay over time as a result of losing focus. The failure in success over the 1-2 years will simply be the easy punch to the company’s kidneys.
- Surface RT will evaporate as a laptop solution. If you’re a developer today targeting ARM and you’re thinking to yourself “this is fun” then you’re currently in a small cluster. Today to target Windows 8 ARM would mean you are happy to migrate your code-base over to the new Windows SDK and it isn’t a clean migration at the best of times. Moreover you have to also ignore the lack luster ubiquity metrics that will come out alongside any and all developer relation(s) resets that have occurred in the last 5 years. If you can absorb all of that and still think ARM is the vehicle of choice – then yeah, I just don’t see any upside here.